Difference between revisions of "Data Collection"

From BIF Guidelines Wiki
(Redirected page to Category:Data Collection)
Tag: New redirect
 
(127 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Data Collection for Seedstock Producers=
+
#REDIRECT [[:Category:Data Collection]]
==ID systems==
+
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data.  While [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_quality data quality] is critical, the quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operations.  Along with weights and scores for [[Economically Relevant Traits | economically relevant traits]] and their [[Indicator_Traits | indicators]], accurate [[Identification Systems | identification of animals]], parents, [[Contemporary Groups | contemporary groups]], and other important details (e.g., age) are essential. (Go [[Traits | here for a list of traits and their definitions)]].
===Herd IDs===
+
=Collection of data to enter genetic evaluation=
===Tattoos===
+
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high-quality data. Data quality can be impacted by [https://www.precisely.com/blog/data-quality/data-quality-dimensions-measure several clearly identified factors].  While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality data.  Using consistent procedures for collecting, recording, manipulating and [[Data_Processing | processing data]] at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data. 
===Breed Association Registration Numbers===
 
===International Registration Numbers===
 
====Breed Codes====
 
=====ICAR=====
 
=====NAAB=====
 
==Whole Herd Reporting==
 
===Basics===
 
===Timeline===
 
===Disposal and Reason Codes===
 
Data collection by sex/age (trait lists for each)
 
Contemporary groups by trait
 
Data on
 
Multiple births/twins/freemartins
 
ETs
 
Calves(through yearling/slaughter)
 
Survival from birth to weaning data
 
Disposal
 
Disease
 
CE scores
 
Weights-BW (hoof tapes), WW, YW
 
Hip height/frame?
 
Docility
 
Ultrasound (link to UGC website)
 
Yearling bulls (breeding)
 
BSE-scrotal
 
Ultrasound
 
Heifers (1-2 yo)
 
Repro tract scores
 
Pelvic measurements
 
Exposure for HP EPDs
 
Preg data
 
CE scores on calves
 
Cows (breeding)
 
Mature weight/height
 
Gestation length
 
Calving interval
 
Udder scores
 
Foot/leg
 
BCS
 
Intake
 
Stay
 
Preg data
 
Genomic data
 
Commercial (in addition to seedstock data)
 
May not collect individual data
 
SPA data-ish
 
Percentages
 
Overall cowherd performance
 
Herd, sire and cow reproductive efficiency
 
MPPA
 
Calving distribution
 
Feedlot
 
Intake/feed efficiency
 
Health
 
ADG
 
Packers
 
Carcass traits (link to good explanation of YG and QG)
 
Data that are necessary-dates, sex, at least a sire, breed comp
 
WBSF? (link?)
 
Have to work with producers
 
Herd management records (in Data Prep section)
 
Software
 
  
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data.  While [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_quality data quality] is critical, quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operationsAlong with weights and scores for economically relevant traits and their indicator traits, accurate identification of animals, parents, [[contemporary groups]], and other important details (e.g., age) are essential.  
+
In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal, an effective [[Identification Systems | beef cattle identification system]] is essentialStandards have been developed for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data, including [[Genomic Data | genomic information.]]  Because the number of animals processed in [[:Category:Genetic Evaluation | genetic evaluation]] is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. Ear tagging and on-farm electronic identification are often implemented in place of using a full registration identifier.
  
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high quality data. Data quality can be impacted by [https://smartbridge.com/data-done-right-6-dimensions-of-data-quality-part-1/ several clearly identified factors]. While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality dataCollecting, recording, manipulating and processing data using consistent procedures at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data.
+
Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered.  By contrast, inventory-based [[Whole Herd Reporting]] (WHR) requires the collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd.  Where possible, [[Whole_Herd_Reporting | whole herd reporting]] is recommended to capture the greatest amount of complete cowherd information. [[Whole Herd Reporting#Performance recording requirements | Data recording on individual cows]] is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most important determinant of profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for the prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. [[Weaning_Weight | weaning weight]])The [[Whole Herd Reporting#Performance recording requirements | female production data]] to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with.
  
=[[Beef cattle identification system]]=
+
Regardless of whether using an [[Whole Herd Reporting | inventory-based reporting system]] or not, accurate phenotypic data collection is vital to genetic evaluation.  Collection of complete and accurate data on [[Whole_Herd_Reporting#Performance_record_requirements | calves, bulls, heifers, mature cows]], or fed cattle (including [[Required_Carcass_Data_Collection_for_Use_in_Genetic_Evaluations| carcass data]]) is critical to making genetic improvementProducers may also be interested in working with their breed associations to provide data for [[Traits | novel traits]], where EPDs may be under development.  When reporting these data, it is also vital to include appropriate [[Contemporary Groups | contemporary grouping]] information to ensure that the data are appropriately incorporated into the evaluation. Using consistent methods for taking animals' weights, measures, and scores is key to accurate dataAdditionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied performance recording software helps to improve the consistency of data collection and reporting.  Producers are encouraged to contact their breed associations to obtain recommendations on what software may be compatible with their systems.
In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective [[beef cattle identification system]] is essential.  [[beef cattle identification system | Standards have been developed]] for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of dataBecause the number of animals processed in [[National Cattle Evaluations programs (NCE)]] is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. [[Standards for ear tagging]] and on-farm electronic identification have also been implementedIn addition, recording of animal identification is closely associated with the collection of [[Genomic Information | genomic information.]]
 
  
=[[Whole Herd Reporting]]=
+
[[Data Collection for Commercial Producers | Data collected by commercial cattle producers]] are, in most cases, substantially different than data collection requirements for seedstock producers.
Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered.  By contrast, inventory based [[Whole Herd Reporting]] (WHR) requires collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd.
 
 
 
 
 
==[[Female Production Data | Data to be recorded on individual cows]]==
 
[[Female Production Data | Data recording on individual cows]] is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most impactful factor on profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight).
 
 
 
The [[Female Production Data]] to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with.
 
 
 
==[[Animal Performance Data]]==
 
Data collection of complete and accurate data on individual calf performance through slaughter or breeding is critical to making genetic improvement.  Using consistent methods for taking [[Animal Performance Data | animals' weights, measures, and scores]] is key to accurate data.  Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied [[Performance Recording Software | performance recording software]] helps to improve consistency of data collection and reporting.
 

Latest revision as of 17:48, 12 April 2021

At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data. While data quality is critical, the quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operations. Along with weights and scores for economically relevant traits and their indicators, accurate identification of animals, parents, contemporary groups, and other important details (e.g., age) are essential. (Go here for a list of traits and their definitions).

Collection of data to enter genetic evaluation

At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high-quality data. Data quality can be impacted by several clearly identified factors. While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality data. Using consistent procedures for collecting, recording, manipulating and processing data at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data.

In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal, an effective beef cattle identification system is essential. Standards have been developed for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data, including genomic information. Because the number of animals processed in genetic evaluation is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. Ear tagging and on-farm electronic identification are often implemented in place of using a full registration identifier.

Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered.  By contrast, inventory-based Whole Herd Reporting (WHR) requires the collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd. Where possible, whole herd reporting is recommended to capture the greatest amount of complete cowherd information. Data recording on individual cows is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most important determinant of profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for the prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight). The female production data to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with.

Regardless of whether using an inventory-based reporting system or not, accurate phenotypic data collection is vital to genetic evaluation. Collection of complete and accurate data on calves, bulls, heifers, mature cows, or fed cattle (including carcass data) is critical to making genetic improvement. Producers may also be interested in working with their breed associations to provide data for novel traits, where EPDs may be under development. When reporting these data, it is also vital to include appropriate contemporary grouping information to ensure that the data are appropriately incorporated into the evaluation. Using consistent methods for taking animals' weights, measures, and scores is key to accurate data. Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied performance recording software helps to improve the consistency of data collection and reporting. Producers are encouraged to contact their breed associations to obtain recommendations on what software may be compatible with their systems.

Data collected by commercial cattle producers are, in most cases, substantially different than data collection requirements for seedstock producers.