Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.
PG30: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
clicking on the Create button or redlink and reload the page | clicking on the Create button or redlink and reload the page | ||
--> | --> | ||
[[Category: Reproduction Traits]] | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Place brief trait definition/description here | Place brief trait definition/description here | ||
--> | --> | ||
The ability to | The ability to rebreed for a second calf given that a heifer had her first calf as a two-year-old may be influenced by the animal's ability to continue to grow to maturity and still conceive. As of this writing one beef cattle organization, the American Gelbvieh Association (AGA), produces an EPD for PG30. | ||
===Phenotype=== | ===Phenotype=== | ||
<!-- Describe ways the phenotype is collected | <!-- Describe ways the phenotype is collected | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Binary observations for PG30 of 0 or 1 | Binary observations for PG30 of 0 or 1 | ||
are assigned to those females who have a successful calving from being bred for the first time to calve as a two-year-old (HPG). If a female with a | are assigned to those females who have a successful calving from being bred for the first time to calve as a two-year-old (HPG). If a female with a | ||
successful HPG observation recorded a calf from being bred a second time to calve as a three-year-old | successful HPG observation recorded a calf from being bred a second time to calve as a three-year-old, she is assigned a successful PG30 observation (1). If a female with a successful HPG observation fails to | ||
record a calf from being bred a second time to calve at three years of age, | record a calf from being bred a second time to calve at three years of age, she is assigned an unsuccessful PG30 observation | ||
(0). | (0). | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<!-- Discuss how contemporary groups are formed --> | <!-- Discuss how contemporary groups are formed --> | ||
Contemporary group is formed by the concatenation of | Contemporary group is formed by the concatenation of | ||
yearling herd/workgroup and year of birth. Observations on females who are transferred between first and second calves should be eliminated from the PG30 contemporary group or regrouped if sufficient | yearling herd/workgroup and year of birth. Observations on females who are transferred between first and second calves should be eliminated from the PG30 contemporary group, or regrouped if numbers are sufficient. | ||
===Genetic Evaluation=== | ===Genetic Evaluation=== | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
E.g., direct, maternal, permanent environment due to dam. | E.g., direct, maternal, permanent environment due to dam. | ||
--> | --> | ||
The AGA PG30 | The AGA PG30 EPD is produced using a single-trait linear pedigree [[Best Linear Unbiased Prediction | BLUP]] animal model that includes | ||
contemporary group, percent Gelbvieh and percent expected heterozygosity as | contemporary group, percent Gelbvieh and percent expected heterozygosity as | ||
fixed effects. | fixed effects. | ||
Observations from contemporary groups with no | Observations from contemporary groups with no variation (all 1's or all 0's) are eliminated in the AGA analysis. However, this may not be necessary unless a maximum ''a posteriori'' threshold model is used, which requires variation in contemporaty group when fit as a fixed effect for singularity. | ||
Without [[Whole Herd Reporting]] with well-collected [[Disposal_Codes#Weaning_through_mature_cattle | disposal codes]] assumptions about exposures may need to be made that reduce the precision of the resulting genetic predictions. | |||
Currently, there is no peer-reviewed literature describing the methods used for the AGA evaluation. | |||
===Usage=== | ===Usage=== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 50: | ||
PG30 can be an [[Economically Relevant Traits | ERT]]. However, care should be taken when evaluating PG30 (e.g. in a [[Selection Index | selection index]]) where [[Stayability | stayability or sustained cow fertility]] EPDs are available. | PG30 can be an [[Economically Relevant Traits | ERT]]. However, care should be taken when evaluating PG30 (e.g. in a [[Selection Index | selection index]]) where [[Stayability | stayability or sustained cow fertility]] EPDs are available. | ||
===Attribution=== | ===Attribution=== | ||
Information in the article was derived from a report produced for the AGA by Scott Speidel and Mark Enns Colorado State University, Fort Collins; Additional information came from a report by Mike MacNeil, Delta G. | Information in the article was derived from a report produced for the AGA by Scott Speidel and Mark Enns, Colorado State University, Fort Collins; Additional information came from a report by Mike MacNeil, Delta G. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:48, 13 April 2021
The ability to rebreed for a second calf given that a heifer had her first calf as a two-year-old may be influenced by the animal's ability to continue to grow to maturity and still conceive. As of this writing one beef cattle organization, the American Gelbvieh Association (AGA), produces an EPD for PG30.
Phenotype
Binary observations for PG30 of 0 or 1 are assigned to those females who have a successful calving from being bred for the first time to calve as a two-year-old (HPG). If a female with a successful HPG observation recorded a calf from being bred a second time to calve as a three-year-old, she is assigned a successful PG30 observation (1). If a female with a successful HPG observation fails to record a calf from being bred a second time to calve at three years of age, she is assigned an unsuccessful PG30 observation (0).
Adjusted Value
No adjustments are available for PG30
Contempory Group
Contemporary group is formed by the concatenation of yearling herd/workgroup and year of birth. Observations on females who are transferred between first and second calves should be eliminated from the PG30 contemporary group, or regrouped if numbers are sufficient.
Genetic Evaluation
The AGA PG30 EPD is produced using a single-trait linear pedigree BLUP animal model that includes contemporary group, percent Gelbvieh and percent expected heterozygosity as fixed effects.
Observations from contemporary groups with no variation (all 1's or all 0's) are eliminated in the AGA analysis. However, this may not be necessary unless a maximum a posteriori threshold model is used, which requires variation in contemporaty group when fit as a fixed effect for singularity.
Without Whole Herd Reporting with well-collected disposal codes assumptions about exposures may need to be made that reduce the precision of the resulting genetic predictions.
Currently, there is no peer-reviewed literature describing the methods used for the AGA evaluation.
Usage
PG30 can be an ERT. However, care should be taken when evaluating PG30 (e.g. in a selection index) where stayability or sustained cow fertility EPDs are available.
Attribution
Information in the article was derived from a report produced for the AGA by Scott Speidel and Mark Enns, Colorado State University, Fort Collins; Additional information came from a report by Mike MacNeil, Delta G.
