Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.
Data Collection: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Data Collection for Seedstock Producers= | =Data Collection for Seedstock Producers= | ||
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data. While [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_quality data quality] is critical, quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operations. Along with weights and scores for economically relevant traits and their indicator traits, accurate identification of animals, parents, [[contemporary groups]], and other important details (e.g., age) are essential. | |||
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high quality data. Data quality can be impacted by [https://smartbridge.com/data-done-right-6-dimensions-of-data-quality-part-1/ several clearly identified factors]. While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality data. Collecting, recording, manipulating and processing data using consistent procedures at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data. | |||
In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective [[beef cattle identification system]] is essential. [[beef cattle identification system | Standards have been developed]] for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data. Because the number of animals processed in [[National Cattle Evaluations programs (NCE)]] is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. [[Standards for ear tagging]] and on-farm electronic identification have also been implemented. In addition, recording of animal identification is closely associated with the collection of [[Genomic Information | genomic information.]] | |||
Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered. By contrast, inventory based [[Whole Herd Reporting]] (WHR) requires collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd. | |||
[[Female Production Data | Data recording on individual cows]] is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most impactful factor on profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight). | |||
The [[Female Production Data]] to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with. | |||
Data collection of complete and accurate data on individual calf performance through slaughter or breeding is critical to making genetic improvement. Using consistent methods for taking [[Animal Performance Data | animals' weights, measures, and scores]] is key to accurate data. Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied [[Performance Recording Software | performance recording software]] helps to improve consistency of data collection and reporting. | |||
==ID Systems== | ==ID Systems== | ||
===Herd IDs=== | ===Herd IDs=== | ||
Line 86: | Line 101: | ||
Content by Trent Smith | Content by Trent Smith | ||
==Genomic Data | ==Genomic Data== | ||
Use of genomic data requires quality [http://guidelines.thetasolutionsllc.com/index.php/Genotyping sample collection]. Once samples are acquired and processed according to breed association specifications, the data can be incorporated into reporting systems for breed associations, including reporting schemes for [http://guidelines.thetasolutionsllc.com/index.php/Monogenic_Traits monogenic traits] such as horned/polled genotype or [http://guidelines.thetasolutionsllc.com/index.php/Recessive_Genetic_Defects genetic abnormality] carrier status as well as for quantitative traits, which will be utilized within either [http://guidelines.thetasolutionsllc.com/index.php/Single-step_Genomic_BLUP single-step genomic BLUP] or [http://guidelines.thetasolutionsllc.com/index.php/Single-step_Hybrid_Marker_Effects_Models single-step hybrid marker effects models] for genetic prediction. Genotype data is also often used for [[parentage testing || Parentage Testing]] for embryo transfer calves or in the case of ambiguous birth date. | |||
===Parentage=== | ===Parentage=== | ||
content by Megan Rolf | content by Megan Rolf | ||
=Data Collection for Commercial Producers= | =Data Collection for Commercial Producers= | ||
Line 120: | Line 135: | ||
===Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (link)=== | ===Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (link)=== | ||
===Quality Grade and Yield Grade (link)=== | ===Quality Grade and Yield Grade (link)=== | ||
=Herd Management Software (link to Data Prep section)= | |||
Revision as of 16:03, 7 May 2019
Data Collection for Seedstock Producers
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data. While data quality is critical, quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operations. Along with weights and scores for economically relevant traits and their indicator traits, accurate identification of animals, parents, contemporary groups, and other important details (e.g., age) are essential.
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high quality data. Data quality can be impacted by several clearly identified factors. While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality data. Collecting, recording, manipulating and processing data using consistent procedures at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data.
In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective beef cattle identification system is essential. Standards have been developed for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data. Because the number of animals processed in National Cattle Evaluations programs (NCE) is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. Standards for ear tagging and on-farm electronic identification have also been implemented. In addition, recording of animal identification is closely associated with the collection of genomic information.
Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered. By contrast, inventory based Whole Herd Reporting (WHR) requires collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd.
Data recording on individual cows is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most impactful factor on profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight).
The Female Production Data to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with.
Data collection of complete and accurate data on individual calf performance through slaughter or breeding is critical to making genetic improvement. Using consistent methods for taking animals' weights, measures, and scores is key to accurate data. Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied performance recording software helps to improve consistency of data collection and reporting.
ID Systems
Herd IDs
Tattoos
Breed Association Registration Numbers
International Registration Numbers
Breed Codes
ICAR
NAAB
Whole Herd Reporting
Basics
Timeline
Disposal and Reason Codes
Contemporary Groups
content by Jennifer Bormann
Basics
Type of Birth
Multiple Births and Freemartins
ET Calves
Components by Trait
Data Collection on Calves
Survival to Weaning
Disposal
Disease
Weights
BW
Hoof Tapes?
Weaning Weight
Yearling Weight
Content by Michael Gonda
CE Scores
Hip Height/Frame
Discuss whether to include
Docility
Ultrasound (link to UGC website)
Data Collection on Yearling Bulls
Content by Madison Butler/Megan Rolf
Breeding Soundness Exam
Scrotal Circumference
Data Collection on Yearling Heifers
Pelvic Measurements
Content by Dave Patterson
Reproductive Tract Scores
Content by Dave Patterson
Exposure Data
Pregnancy Data
CE Scores on Calves
Data Collection on Mature Cows
Calf Record/Reason Code (for Stayability)
Exposure and Pregnancy Data
Gestation Length
Calving Interval
Mature Height and Weight
content by Heather Bradford
Body Condition Scores
Content by Dave Lalman
Teat and Udder Scores
Content by David Riley
Foot and Leg Scores
content by Lane Giess
Intake
Adaptability-Related Traits
PAP Scores
Content by Mark Enns, Milt Thomas, and Scott Speidel
Hair Shedding
Content by Trent Smith
Genomic Data
Use of genomic data requires quality sample collection. Once samples are acquired and processed according to breed association specifications, the data can be incorporated into reporting systems for breed associations, including reporting schemes for monogenic traits such as horned/polled genotype or genetic abnormality carrier status as well as for quantitative traits, which will be utilized within either single-step genomic BLUP or single-step hybrid marker effects models for genetic prediction. Genotype data is also often used for | Parentage Testing for embryo transfer calves or in the case of ambiguous birth date.
Parentage
content by Megan Rolf
Data Collection for Commercial Producers
Content by Jackie Atkins (and Chip Kemp?)
See Seedstock Data Collection (link)
Herd Measurements
Calving Distribution
Bull Measurements
Cow Measurements
MPPA
Data Collection at Feedlots
Content by Larry Kuehn