Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.
Data Collection: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Data Collection for Seedstock Producers= | =Data Collection for Seedstock Producers= | ||
==ID | ==ID Systems== | ||
===Herd IDs=== | ===Herd IDs=== | ||
===Tattoos=== | ===Tattoos=== | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===Timeline=== | ===Timeline=== | ||
===Disposal and Reason Codes=== | ===Disposal and Reason Codes=== | ||
==Contemporary Groups== | |||
===Basics=== | |||
===Type of Birth=== | |||
Multiple | ====Multiple Births and Freemartins==== | ||
====ET Calves==== | |||
Calves | ===Components by Trait=== | ||
Survival | ==Data Collection on Calves== | ||
Disposal | ===Survival to Weaning=== | ||
Disease | ====Disposal==== | ||
====Disease==== | |||
===Weights=== | |||
Hip | ====BW==== | ||
Docility | =====Hoof Tapes?===== | ||
Ultrasound (link to UGC website) | ====WW==== | ||
Yearling | ====YW==== | ||
===CE Scores=== | |||
===Hip Height/Frame=== | |||
Heifers | ====Discuss whether to include==== | ||
===Docility=== | |||
===Ultrasound (link to UGC website)=== | |||
Exposure | ==Data Collection on Yearling Bulls== | ||
===Breeding Soundness Exam=== | |||
CE | ===Scrotal Circumference=== | ||
Cows ( | ==Data Collection on Yearling Heifers== | ||
===Pelvic Measurements=== | |||
Gestation | ===Reproductive Tract Scores=== | ||
Calving | ===Exposure Data=== | ||
Udder | ===Pregnancy Data=== | ||
Foot | ===CE Scores on Calves=== | ||
==Data Collection on Mature Cows== | |||
Intake | ===Calf Record/Reason Code (for Stayability)=== | ||
===Exposure and Pregnancy Data=== | |||
===Gestation Length=== | |||
===Calving Interval=== | |||
Commercial ( | ===Mature Height and Weight=== | ||
===Body Condition Score=== | |||
===Teat and Udder Scores=== | |||
===Foot and Leg Scores=== | |||
===Intake=== | |||
==Genomic Data (link to Data Prep section)== | |||
MPPA | ===Parentage=== | ||
===Genetic Evaluation=== | |||
=Data Collection for Commercial Producers= | |||
Intake | ==See Seedstock Data Collection (link)== | ||
Health | ==Herd Measurements== | ||
===Calving Distribution=== | |||
==Bull Measurements== | |||
Carcass | ==Cow Measurements== | ||
===MPPA=== | |||
=Data Collection at Feedlots= | |||
==Average Daily Gain== | |||
Herd | ==Intake and Feed Efficiency== | ||
==Health Traits== | |||
=Data Collection at Packers= | |||
==Carcass Traits== | |||
===Cooperation Between Packer and Producer=== | |||
===Required Data for Genetic Evaluation=== | |||
===Hot Carcass Weight=== | |||
===Ribeye Area=== | |||
===Marbling Score=== | |||
===Fat Thickness=== | |||
===Other Traits (e.g. KPH)=== | |||
===Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (link)=== | |||
===Quality Grade and Yield Grade (link)=== | |||
=Herd Management Software (link to Data Prep section)= | |||
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data. While [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_quality data quality] is critical, quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operations. Along with weights and scores for economically relevant traits and their indicator traits, accurate identification of animals, parents, [[contemporary groups]], and other important details (e.g., age) are essential. | At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data. While [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_quality data quality] is critical, quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operations. Along with weights and scores for economically relevant traits and their indicator traits, accurate identification of animals, parents, [[contemporary groups]], and other important details (e.g., age) are essential. | ||
Line 70: | Line 83: | ||
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high quality data. Data quality can be impacted by [https://smartbridge.com/data-done-right-6-dimensions-of-data-quality-part-1/ several clearly identified factors]. While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality data. Collecting, recording, manipulating and processing data using consistent procedures at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data. | At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high quality data. Data quality can be impacted by [https://smartbridge.com/data-done-right-6-dimensions-of-data-quality-part-1/ several clearly identified factors]. While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality data. Collecting, recording, manipulating and processing data using consistent procedures at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data. | ||
In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective [[beef cattle identification system]] is essential. [[beef cattle identification system | Standards have been developed]] for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data. Because the number of animals processed in [[National Cattle Evaluations programs (NCE)]] is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. [[Standards for ear tagging]] and on-farm electronic identification have also been implemented. In addition, recording of animal identification is closely associated with the collection of [[Genomic Information | genomic information.]] | In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective [[beef cattle identification system]] is essential. [[beef cattle identification system | Standards have been developed]] for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data. Because the number of animals processed in [[National Cattle Evaluations programs (NCE)]] is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. [[Standards for ear tagging]] and on-farm electronic identification have also been implemented. In addition, recording of animal identification is closely associated with the collection of [[Genomic Information | genomic information.]] | ||
Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered. By contrast, inventory based [[Whole Herd Reporting]] (WHR) requires collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd. | Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered. By contrast, inventory based [[Whole Herd Reporting]] (WHR) requires collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd. | ||
[[Female Production Data | Data recording on individual cows]] is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most impactful factor on profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight). | [[Female Production Data | Data recording on individual cows]] is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most impactful factor on profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight). | ||
The [[Female Production Data]] to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with. | The [[Female Production Data]] to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with. | ||
Data collection of complete and accurate data on individual calf performance through slaughter or breeding is critical to making genetic improvement. Using consistent methods for taking [[Animal Performance Data | animals' weights, measures, and scores]] is key to accurate data. Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied [[Performance Recording Software | performance recording software]] helps to improve consistency of data collection and reporting. | Data collection of complete and accurate data on individual calf performance through slaughter or breeding is critical to making genetic improvement. Using consistent methods for taking [[Animal Performance Data | animals' weights, measures, and scores]] is key to accurate data. Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied [[Performance Recording Software | performance recording software]] helps to improve consistency of data collection and reporting. |
Revision as of 16:15, 26 November 2018
Data Collection for Seedstock Producers
ID Systems
Herd IDs
Tattoos
Breed Association Registration Numbers
International Registration Numbers
Breed Codes
ICAR
NAAB
Whole Herd Reporting
Basics
Timeline
Disposal and Reason Codes
Contemporary Groups
Basics
Type of Birth
Multiple Births and Freemartins
ET Calves
Components by Trait
Data Collection on Calves
Survival to Weaning
Disposal
Disease
Weights
BW
Hoof Tapes?
WW
YW
CE Scores
Hip Height/Frame
Discuss whether to include
Docility
Ultrasound (link to UGC website)
Data Collection on Yearling Bulls
Breeding Soundness Exam
Scrotal Circumference
Data Collection on Yearling Heifers
Pelvic Measurements
Reproductive Tract Scores
Exposure Data
Pregnancy Data
CE Scores on Calves
Data Collection on Mature Cows
Calf Record/Reason Code (for Stayability)
Exposure and Pregnancy Data
Gestation Length
Calving Interval
Mature Height and Weight
Body Condition Score
Teat and Udder Scores
Foot and Leg Scores
Intake
Genomic Data (link to Data Prep section)
Parentage
Genetic Evaluation
Data Collection for Commercial Producers
See Seedstock Data Collection (link)
Herd Measurements
Calving Distribution
Bull Measurements
Cow Measurements
MPPA
Data Collection at Feedlots
Average Daily Gain
Intake and Feed Efficiency
Health Traits
Data Collection at Packers
Carcass Traits
Cooperation Between Packer and Producer
Required Data for Genetic Evaluation
Hot Carcass Weight
Ribeye Area
Marbling Score
Fat Thickness
Other Traits (e.g. KPH)
Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (link)
Quality Grade and Yield Grade (link)
Herd Management Software (link to Data Prep section)
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data. While data quality is critical, quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operations. Along with weights and scores for economically relevant traits and their indicator traits, accurate identification of animals, parents, contemporary groups, and other important details (e.g., age) are essential.
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high quality data. Data quality can be impacted by several clearly identified factors. While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality data. Collecting, recording, manipulating and processing data using consistent procedures at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data.
In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective beef cattle identification system is essential. Standards have been developed for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data. Because the number of animals processed in National Cattle Evaluations programs (NCE) is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. Standards for ear tagging and on-farm electronic identification have also been implemented. In addition, recording of animal identification is closely associated with the collection of genomic information.
Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered. By contrast, inventory based Whole Herd Reporting (WHR) requires collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd.
Data recording on individual cows is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most impactful factor on profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight).
The Female Production Data to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with.
Data collection of complete and accurate data on individual calf performance through slaughter or breeding is critical to making genetic improvement. Using consistent methods for taking animals' weights, measures, and scores is key to accurate data. Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied performance recording software helps to improve consistency of data collection and reporting.