Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.

Genetic Evaluation: Difference between revisions

From BIF Guidelines Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
==Basic Models==
==Basic Models==
===BLUP===
===BLUP===
===ssGBLUP (Suggested writer: Daniela Lorenco)===
===ssGBLUP (Suggested writer: Daniela Lourenco)===
===Single-step Hybrid Models (Suggested writer: Dorian Garrick)===
===Single-step Hybrid Models (Suggested writer: Dorian Garrick)===
==Interim Calculations==
==Interim Calculations==

Revision as of 22:06, 13 January 2019

EPD

Utility (compared to actual/adjusted phenotypes, ratios, disjoined marker scores, etc.) (Suggested writer: Megan Rolf)

Basic Models

BLUP

ssGBLUP (Suggested writer: Daniela Lourenco)

Single-step Hybrid Models (Suggested writer: Dorian Garrick)

Interim Calculations

Bias

(in)complete reporting / contemporary groups / preferential treatment (Suggested writer: Bob Weaber

Accuracy (Suggested writer: Matt Spangler)

meaning of accuracy

what impacts accuracy

different definitions of accuracy (true, BIF, reliability)

Variance components (Suggested writer: Steve Kachman)

Impact on EPD, accuracy, genetic gain (Suggested writer: Steve Kachman)

Heterogeneous variance

Connectivity (Suggested writer: Ron Lewis

Measures of (Suggested writer: Ron Lewis

Impact on GE

Current GE

How each breed (organization) is modeling each trait (Suggested writers: Steve Miller, Lauren Hyde, AHA)