Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.
Data Collection: Difference between revisions
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective [[beef cattle identification system]] is essential. [[beef cattle identification system | Standards have been developed]] for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data. Because the number of animals processed in [[National Cattle Evaluations programs (NCE)]] is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. [[Standards for ear tagging]] and on-farm electronic identification have also been implemented. In addition, recording of animal identification is closely associated with the collection of [[Genomic Information | genomic information.]] | In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective [[beef cattle identification system]] is essential. [[beef cattle identification system | Standards have been developed]] for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data. Because the number of animals processed in [[National Cattle Evaluations programs (NCE)]] is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. [[Standards for ear tagging]] and on-farm electronic identification have also been implemented. In addition, recording of animal identification is closely associated with the collection of [[Genomic Information | genomic information.]] | ||
Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered. By contrast, inventory based [[Whole Herd Reporting]] (WHR) requires collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd. | Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered. By contrast, inventory-based [[Whole Herd Reporting]] (WHR) requires the collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd. | ||
[[ | [[Whole Herd Reporting#Performance recording requirements | Data recording on individual cows]] is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most impactful factor on profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for the prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight). | ||
The [[ | The [[Whole Herd Reporting#Performance recording requirements | female production data]] to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with. | ||
Data collection of complete and accurate data on individual calf performance through slaughter or breeding is critical to making genetic improvement. Using consistent methods for taking | Data collection of complete and accurate data on individual calf performance through slaughter or breeding is critical to making genetic improvement. Using consistent methods for taking animals' weights, measures, and scores is key to accurate data. Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied [[Performance Recording Software | performance recording software]] helps to improve consistency of data collection and reporting. | ||
==ID Systems== | ==ID Systems== |
Revision as of 14:54, 17 May 2019
Data Collection for Seedstock Producers
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of data. While data quality is critical, quantity of data collected can sometimes overcome the limitations on data quality that inherently occur in farm and ranch operations. Along with weights and scores for economically relevant traits and their indicator traits, accurate identification of animals, parents, contemporary groups, and other important details (e.g., age) are essential.
At the core of genetic improvement is the collection of high quality data. Data quality can be impacted by several clearly identified factors. While completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and conformity are all essential, consistency is often the least understood and most overlooked consideration for quality data. Collecting, recording, manipulating and processing data using consistent procedures at both the farm and association levels is the most important aspect to maintaining quality data.
In order to keep all data collected associated with an individual animal an effective beef cattle identification system is essential. Standards have been developed for identification methods that ensure unique and accurate identification of animals during the transmission and processing of data. Because the number of animals processed in National Cattle Evaluations programs (NCE) is routinely in the millions, it is not practical to routinely use registration number information for on-farm data collection. Standards for ear tagging and on-farm electronic identification have also been implemented. In addition, recording of animal identification is closely associated with the collection of genomic information.
Historically, many beef breed genetic evaluations were based on progeny weaned and/or registered and did not require that data be recorded from females that failed to reproduce or whose progeny were not registered. By contrast, inventory-based Whole Herd Reporting (WHR) requires the collection of annual production and performance records on all cattle within a herd.
Data recording on individual cows is essential for the prediction of female fertility. Cow fertility is often the most impactful factor on profitability in the beef herd. Additionally, accurate and complete cow data are essential for the prediction of traits with a maternal influence (e.g. weaning weight).
The female production data to be recorded on each cow must be standardized because it is often the most complex data that a producer deals with.
Data collection of complete and accurate data on individual calf performance through slaughter or breeding is critical to making genetic improvement. Using consistent methods for taking animals' weights, measures, and scores is key to accurate data. Additionally, using a commercial or breed association supplied performance recording software helps to improve consistency of data collection and reporting.
ID Systems
Herd IDs
Tattoos
Breed Association Registration Numbers
International Registration Numbers
Breed Codes
ICAR
NAAB
Whole Herd Reporting
Basics
Timeline
Disposal and Reason Codes
Contemporary Groups
content by Jennifer Bormann
Basics
Type of Birth
Multiple Births and Freemartins
ET Calves
Components by Trait
Data Collection on Calves
Survival to Weaning
Disposal
Disease
Weights
Birth Weight
Content by Michael Gonda and Bradie Schmidt, SDSU
Hoof Tapes
Weaning Weight
Yearling Weight
Content by Michael Gonda and Bradie Schmidt, SDSU
CE Scores
Hip Height/Frame
Docility
Ultrasound (link to UGC website)
Data Collection on Yearling Bulls
Content by Madison Butler/Megan Rolf
Breeding Soundness Exam
Scrotal Circumference
Data Collection on Yearling Heifers
Pelvic Measurements
Content by Dave Patterson
Reproductive Tract Scores
Content by Dave Patterson
Exposure Data
Content by Dave Patterson?
Pregnancy Data
Content by Dave Patterson?
CE Scores
Content by Dave Patterson?
Data Collection on Mature Cows
Calf Record/Reason Code (for Stayability)
Exposure and Pregnancy Data
Gestation Length
Calving Interval
Mature Height and Weight
content by Heather Bradford
Body Condition Scores
Content by Dave Lalman
Teat and Udder Scores
Content by David Riley
Foot and Leg Scores
content by Lane Giess
Intake
Adaptability-Related Traits
PAP Scores
Content by Mark Enns, Milt Thomas, and Scott Speidel
Hair Shedding
Content by Trent Smith
Genomic Data
Use of genomic data requires quality sample collection. Once samples are acquired and processed according to breed association specifications, the data can be incorporated into reporting systems for breed associations, including reporting schemes for monogenic traits such as horned/polled genotype or genetic abnormality carrier status as well as for quantitative traits, which will be utilized within either single-step genomic BLUP or single-step hybrid marker effects models for genetic prediction. Genotype data can also be utilized for other applications, as detailed below.
Parentage Testing
content by Megan Rolf
Data Collection for Commercial Producers
Content by Jackie Atkins and Chip Kemp
See Seedstock Data Collection (link)
Herd Measurements
Calving Distribution
Bull Measurements
Cow Measurements
MPPA
Data Collection at Feedlots
Content by Larry Kuehn