Difference between revisions of "PG30"
m (→Phenotype) |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<!-- Discuss how contemporary groups are formed --> | <!-- Discuss how contemporary groups are formed --> | ||
Contemporary group is formed by the concatenation of | Contemporary group is formed by the concatenation of | ||
| − | yearling herd/workgroup and year of birth. Observations on females who are transferred between first and second calves should be eliminated from the PG30 contemporary group or regrouped if sufficient | + | yearling herd/workgroup and year of birth. Observations on females who are transferred between first and second calves should be eliminated from the PG30 contemporary group, or regrouped if numbers are sufficient. |
| + | |||
===Genetic Evaluation=== | ===Genetic Evaluation=== | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Revision as of 16:35, 30 October 2019
The ability to re-breed for a second calf given that a heifer had her first calf as a two-year-old may be influenced by the animal's ability to continue to grow to maturity and still conceive. As of this writing one beef cattle organization, the American Gelbvieh Association, produces EPDs for PG30.
Phenotype
Binary observations for PG30 of 0 or 1 are assigned to those females who have a successful calving from being bred for the first time to calve as a two-year-old (HPG). If a female with a successful HPG observation recorded a calf from being bred a second time to calve as a three-year-old, she is assigned a successful PG30 observation (1). If a female with a successful HPG observation fails to record a calf from being bred a second time to calve at three years of age, she is assigned an unsuccessful PG30 observation (0).
Adjusted Value
No adjustments are available for PG30
Contempory Group
Contemporary group is formed by the concatenation of yearling herd/workgroup and year of birth. Observations on females who are transferred between first and second calves should be eliminated from the PG30 contemporary group, or regrouped if numbers are sufficient.
Genetic Evaluation
The AGA PG30 EPDs are produced using a single-trait linear pedigree BLUP animal model that included contemporary group, percent Gelbvieh and percent expected heterozygosity as fixed effects.
Observations from contemporary groups with no variations (all 1's or all 0's) were eliminated in the AGA analysis. However, this may not be necessary unless a maximum a posteriori threshold model is used, which requires variation in contemporaty group when fit as a fixed effect for singularity.
Usage
PG30 can be an ERT. However, care should be taken when evaluating PG30 (e.g. in a selection index) where stayability or sustained cow fertility EPDs are available.
Attribution
Information in the article was derived from a report produced for the AGA by Scott Speidel and Mark Enns Colorado State University, Fort Collins; Additional information came from a report by Mike MacNeil, Delta G.
