Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.
Ultrasound back fat thickness: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
clicking on the Create button or redlink and reload the page | clicking on the Create button or redlink and reload the page | ||
--> | --> | ||
[[Category:Carcass Traits]] | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Place brief trait definition/description here | Place brief trait definition/description here | ||
--> | --> | ||
<!-- Describe ways the phenotype is collected | <!-- Describe ways the phenotype is collected | ||
E.g., for birth weight discuss digital scale, mechanical scale, hoof tape, etc. | E.g., for birth weight discuss digital scale, mechanical scale, hoof tape, etc. | ||
--> | --> | ||
The ultrasound rib fat thickness measurement can be made from the same image used to estimate ribeye area. Fat thickness at the 12th-13th rib is measured at a point three fourths of the distance from the medial end of the longissimus dorsi muscle (12-13th rib interface) and perpendicular to the surface | The ultrasound rib fat thickness measurement can be made from the same image used to estimate ribeye area. Fat thickness at the 12th-13th rib is measured at a point three fourths of the distance from the medial end of the longissimus dorsi muscle (12-13th rib interface) and perpendicular to the surface. Ultrasound scanning protocol requires the collection of an image made between the 12th-13th ribs using a linear-array transducer and standoff guide that conforms to the curvature of the animal’s back. Ultrasound [https://ultrasoundguidelinescouncil.org/locate-technicians-or-lab/ technicians and image processing labs] should be certified or accredited by the [https://ultrasoundguidelinescouncil.org/ Ultrasound Guidelines Council] (UGC). The UGC standards for certification can be found at https://ultrasoundguidelinescouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/UGC-SG-VII-FC.pdf. | ||
===Adjusted Value=== | ===Adjusted Value=== | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
If the trait is not adjusted (e.g. Stayability) then say so | If the trait is not adjusted (e.g. Stayability) then say so | ||
--> | --> | ||
Ultrasonic back fat thickness is adjusted to a common age (e.g., 365 days of age) and in | Ultrasonic back fat thickness is adjusted to a common age (e.g., 365 days of age), and in multiple-breed analyses, is also adjusted for breed composition. | ||
=== | ===Contemporary Group=== | ||
<!-- Discuss how contemporary groups are formed --> | <!-- Discuss how contemporary groups are formed --> | ||
Animals of the same sex, reared and managed together up until the time of scanning form a contemporary group. Scanning contemporary group definition includes the following: herd code, weaning date, weaning management group (pasture, creep, non-creep, etc.), scanning date, and post-weaning management group designation. For animals scanned at a central test, the contemporary group definition for an animal should include its herd of origin and other birth and weaning contemporary group information. | |||
===Genetic Evaluation=== | ===Genetic Evaluation=== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
E.g., direct, maternal, permanent environment due to dam. | E.g., direct, maternal, permanent environment due to dam. | ||
--> | --> | ||
Given the ultrasound measure of back fat is an indicator of the economically relevant trait of carcass back fat, it is generally included in multiple-trait models that include carcass back fat and potentially other carcass-fat-related traits (e.g., percentage of intramuscular fat, marbling). There are no maternal effects fitted for ultrasound or carcass traits given the maternal influence declines post-weaning. | |||
===Usage=== | ===Usage=== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 35: | ||
Discuss in what circumstances the trait is an ERT or an indicator trait and how the trait should be used and not used. | Discuss in what circumstances the trait is an ERT or an indicator trait and how the trait should be used and not used. | ||
--> | --> | ||
Ultrasound back fat is an indicator trait that is measured on seedstock animals. It is used to help predict the genetic merit of animals for carcass back fat. The majority of beef breed organizations do not publish an ultrasound back fat EPD but rather publish a back fat EPD on a carcass basis that is the product of a multiple-trait model including the ultrasound indicator trait. | |||
Latest revision as of 17:08, 21 October 2021
The ultrasound rib fat thickness measurement can be made from the same image used to estimate ribeye area. Fat thickness at the 12th-13th rib is measured at a point three fourths of the distance from the medial end of the longissimus dorsi muscle (12-13th rib interface) and perpendicular to the surface. Ultrasound scanning protocol requires the collection of an image made between the 12th-13th ribs using a linear-array transducer and standoff guide that conforms to the curvature of the animal’s back. Ultrasound technicians and image processing labs should be certified or accredited by the Ultrasound Guidelines Council (UGC). The UGC standards for certification can be found at https://ultrasoundguidelinescouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/UGC-SG-VII-FC.pdf.
Adjusted Value
Ultrasonic back fat thickness is adjusted to a common age (e.g., 365 days of age), and in multiple-breed analyses, is also adjusted for breed composition.
Contemporary Group
Animals of the same sex, reared and managed together up until the time of scanning form a contemporary group. Scanning contemporary group definition includes the following: herd code, weaning date, weaning management group (pasture, creep, non-creep, etc.), scanning date, and post-weaning management group designation. For animals scanned at a central test, the contemporary group definition for an animal should include its herd of origin and other birth and weaning contemporary group information.
Genetic Evaluation
Given the ultrasound measure of back fat is an indicator of the economically relevant trait of carcass back fat, it is generally included in multiple-trait models that include carcass back fat and potentially other carcass-fat-related traits (e.g., percentage of intramuscular fat, marbling). There are no maternal effects fitted for ultrasound or carcass traits given the maternal influence declines post-weaning.
Usage
Ultrasound back fat is an indicator trait that is measured on seedstock animals. It is used to help predict the genetic merit of animals for carcass back fat. The majority of beef breed organizations do not publish an ultrasound back fat EPD but rather publish a back fat EPD on a carcass basis that is the product of a multiple-trait model including the ultrasound indicator trait.
