Enhanced comment feature has been enabled for all readers including those not logged in. Click on the Discussion tab (top left) to add or reply to discussions.
Talk:Gene Edited Animal Data: Difference between revisions
From BIF Guidelines Wiki
Latest comment: 11 October by Bgolden in topic BLG Comments on new content
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Should information about the effort/status of any government approvals be included in the data? | * Should information about the effort/status of any government approvals be included in the data? | ||
* Should we add a recommendation for offspring of gene edited parents that an indication should be made on the registration and reports? | * Should we add a recommendation for offspring of gene edited parents that an indication should be made on the registration and reports? | ||
* Should we rename the page "Gene Edited | * Should we rename the page "Gene Edited Animal Data"? That way it sorts to "G" in the master TOC | ||
All good stuff. [[User:Bgolden|Bruce L. Golden]] ([[User talk:Bgolden|talk]]) 18:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | All good stuff. [[User:Bgolden|Bruce L. Golden]] ([[User talk:Bgolden|talk]]) 18:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:19, 11 October 2024
BLG Comments on new content
- I forced the TOC to be the 1st thing since the intro was long. Good intro
- Should information about the effort/status of any government approvals be included in the data?
- Should we add a recommendation for offspring of gene edited parents that an indication should be made on the registration and reports?
- Should we rename the page "Gene Edited Animal Data"? That way it sorts to "G" in the master TOC
All good stuff. Bruce L. Golden (talk) 18:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
